Run report: jira-task-reviewer — df864d2f-3115-4f06-b3c2-24456615eed0

Run snapshot

• When: 2026-07-18 13:40:56Z → 14:01:25Z for the review itself; the session then continued under user direction to 15:33Z.
• cwd / OS: C:\Users\vboxuser\skill-dev\JST-worktrees\worktree-JST-122 — Windows (PowerShell dispatch path, confirmed by statuscheck platform row: os=windows — PowerShell 7 + acli + gh + win/ ports present).
• Branch: feature/JST-122-conversation-feature-report (parent worktree).
• Plugin version that ran: 0.5.0-lab.2 (from the Base-directory line).
• Arguments: none (bare invocation; $ARGUMENTS empty).
• Invocations in session: 1.
• Outcome: The reviewer ran to completion — single-step track, PR #111 APPROVED, verdict posted to GitHub + Jira, status left for GitHub-for-Jira. It finished and reported at 14:01 (S-APPROVED). Everything after 14:13 is a user-commandeered pivot into developing/fixing the JST-122 feature itself (5 commits pushed to the reviewed branch) — outside the reviewer skill.

Run metrics

metric	value
Model(s)	claude-opus-4-8
API turns (SKILL_TURNS)	29
Tool calls (TOOL_CALLS)	28
Tools used (TOOLS_USED)	PowerShell:15 Grep:4 Read:4 Bash:3 Write:2
Tool errors (TOOL_ERRORS)	3 (all PowerShell)
Errors by tool (TOOL_ERRORS_BY_TOOL)	PowerShell:3
Tokens in (TOKENS_IN)	54
Tokens out (TOKENS_OUT)	26,305
Tokens cache-read (TOKENS_CACHE_READ)	2,420,502
Tokens cache-write (TOKENS_CACHE_WRITE)	90,704
Subagent turns (SIDECHAIN_TURNS)	0
Elapsed (WALL_CLOCK_S)	1229 s (20.5 min), FIRST_TS 13:40:56Z → LAST_TS 14:01:25Z

Notes: the metrics are scoped to the reviewer skill's own turns (via attributionSkill), so they cover the review phase (≈13:40–14:01), not the later user-driven development. TOKENS_IN (54) looks tiny only because cache-read (2.4M) dominates on a long-context run — normal, not an anomaly. Elapsed is span, not compute time. There is no cost field in the transcript.

Compliance walk

Scope note: the compliance walk judges the review phase, which is the only part where jira-task-reviewer was the acting skill. Everything from the user's 14:13 interjection onward is a separate, user-directed activity (see Divergences in detail).

Instruction (step / rule)	Verdict	Evidence
Script dispatch — pick OS branch up front, use win/*.ps1 on Windows for every skill script	followed	13:40:57 "Since this is Windows, I'll use the PowerShell script ports"; all three preamble scripts invoked as win/…​.ps1 (4fa4eb91, e4fcae62)
Run ensure_local_env + jira_acli_login reviewer FIRST, unconditionally	followed	4fa4eb91 chains ensure_local_env.ps1 then jira_acli_login.ps1 (login as reviewer) with $LASTEXITCODE guards
Discovery healthcheck with STATUSCHECK_RERUN override, run bare	followed	e4fcae62 sets STATUSCHECK_RERUN="rerun /jira-sdlc:jira-task-reviewer" then runs statuscheck.ps1 with no role/key arg
Read healthcheck: any FAIL → stop; require linked worktree + feature branch	followed	13:43:41 "Healthcheck is all green — linked worktree, feature branch, issue JST-122"; platform row OK
§1 git fetch origin --prune first	followed	17de709f git fetch origin --prune
§1 fetch RUN-KEY with the review-fetch field list	followed	17de709f acli jira workitem view JST-122 --json --fields "summary,description,issuetype,status,parent,subtasks"
§1 issuetype → top-level ⇒ PARENT-KEY = RUN-KEY	followed	13:46:19 "JST-122 is a Story (top-level) … single-step track"
§1 resolve <PARENT-BRANCH> via dedup git branch -a … grep <KEY>	followed	049a5dbb runs the dedup/grep on JST-122
§1 resolve <BASE_BRANCH> via §12 resolver keyed on PARENT	can't-tell	base resolved to lab (used in 3b384093 --base lab), but narration cites the Jira description ("description confirms base branch is lab") rather than the git-config→comment→default chain; result correct, exact source path not shown
§1 determine track (empty subtasks ⇒ single-step)	followed	13:46:19 "empty subtasks → single-step track"
Single-step phase check gh pr list --head --base --state all → OPEN ⇒ step 3	followed	3b384093 returns PR #111; 13:49:34 "PR #111 is OPEN. Proceeding to step 3"
§3 resolve SELF once before the loop	followed	identity kantorv resolved and reused; 13:49:23 "identity kantorv"
§3a idempotency — gh pr view … reviews filtered by SELF, body-prefix	followed	2cdea282 gh pr view 111 --json reviews --jq '… select(.author.login=="kantorv") …'; 13:50:54 "No prior review from me"
§3b fetch full diff, read all files (<1000 lines ⇒ full)	followed	58d83940 name-only + metadata, 921e4e2b full gh pr diff 111, 3f896230 Read of diff; 8 files/+771
§3c evaluate the six review dimensions	followed	14:00:12 walks correctness/pattern/scope/regressions/tests/hygiene; augmented with live end-to-end runs of the code
§3d APPROVE ⇒ canonical report to temp file, post to GitHub + Jira via --body-file, do NOT move status	followed	f57887c1 gh pr review 111 --comment --body-file … (exit 0) + acli … comment create --key JST-122 --body-file … (exit 0); status left untouched
§3e per-sub-task parent tally	not-reached	single-step track has no sub-tasks
§4c single-step approved ⇒ S-APPROVED, tell user to merge manually	followed	14:01:25 chat report with S-APPROVED wording ("Merging is manual … GitHub-for-Jira will auto-transition")
§4a/§4b multistep post-loop outcomes	not-reached	single-step track
§5 parent PR management	not-reached	single-step track never reaches step 5
§6 run-level report to chat + single Jira comment on PARENT-KEY, one outcome	followed	14:01:25 chat render; the 3d Jira comment on JST-122 doubles as the single-step run-level Jira record (PARENT-KEY = RUN-KEY)
"Never merge anything"	followed	no merge performed at any point
Top rule — review this issue only, then stop and report	followed (review phase)	agent stopped and reported at 14:01:25; the later work is user-initiated, post-completion (see below)

Divergences in detail

The reviewer's APPROVE was invalidated by later same-session commits to the reviewed PR

• What the prose says: the reviewer reviews <ISSUE-KEY> "and nothing else. When you have finished it, stop and report." The skill has no step that edits, commits, or pushes code — its whole contract is review + record a verdict ("Never merges anything"; allowed-tools: Bash, Read, Grep, Glob — note: no Write/Edit).
• What happened: the review completed cleanly and APPROVED PR #111 at 14:01:25 (f57887c1). Then, starting at the user's 14:13 interjection, the session pivoted: the user ran the JST-122 feature's own pipeline, found runtime bugs, and directed a series of fixes/enhancements. The agent edited feature_report.ps1 and collect_feature.ps1, updated docs, added report sections and mermaid pie charts, and committed + pushed five times to feature/JST-122-conversation-feature-report (14:27 push, then commits d83a3f7, 7256d45, efd2f38, 69f7e63) — all part of PR #111.
• Consequence: PR #111 now contains substantial code the reviewer never reviewed; the posted APPROVED verdict is stale — it approved a diff of 8 files/+771 that was subsequently rewritten by five more commits.
• Likely why: the user commandeered the session for a different job after the skill run had already finished. Per the debugger's own caveat, "an agent obeying the user over the skill is not a divergence." This is user override, not a jira-task-reviewer compliance defect — the skill correctly ran to completion and stopped first.
• Suggested fix: no skill change. The reviewer did its job and reported; what followed is the user's prerogative. Worth flagging only as an operational caution for the humans: a reviewer session that then edits and pushes to the PR it just approved leaves an approval that no longer matches the code, and a fresh reviewer re-run against the final diff would be the clean way to re-bless PR #111. (This run happens also to be the one whose transcript is the data source for the very feature it was reviewing — a self-referential setup, not a skill problem.)

Incidents

Code executions

What failed (uuid)	Root cause	Agent's reaction	Workaround / fix	Suggested prose fix
pwsh … 2>&1 < $null → "'<' operator is reserved for future use" (73cd69e4, 13:53)	Internal to the agent's ad-hoc test harness — used a bash < redirect inside PowerShell; not skill prose	Recognized immediately: 13:54:48 "I'll fix the PowerShell redirection syntax"	Rewrote the one-liner without <; succeeded on retry	none — the reviewer skill never asks the agent to execute the code under review; this harness is emergent
bash "$base/posix/collect_feature.sh" … → "bash is not recognized" inside the PowerShell tool (8384328c, 13:54)	Environmental — bash not on PATH of the PowerShell tool	Switched to the dedicated Bash tool for the posix stubs (e3d617b5, 9630f31b)	Ran posix stubs via git-bash instead; succeeded	none — emergent testing, not skill-prescribed
feature_report … synthetic.json → "input is not valid JSON" (d1517048, 13:55)	Internal — a stale/mis-copied temp synthetic.json; wrong Windows temp path	Rewrote the fixture to the scratchpad with a clean Windows path (7f4da2fc) and re-ran	Succeeded on the clean path	none — emergent test-fixture plumbing

All three reviewer-scoped errors were self-inflicted syntax/plumbing in the agent's own verification harness (it chose to run the code live as part of the Correctness dimension), each recovered within one retry with no residue and no effect on the verdict. No skill script or prescribed command failed.

Helper scripts worth keeping

What the agent built	Born at (uuid)	Worked?	Suggested home
Synthetic feature-report@1/@2 JSON fixtures + a multi-form input-mode test matrix for feature_report.ps1 (file / process-pipe / native-pipe / guards)	9630f31b, 7f4da2fc, 76b8d439, 1da1528a	yes	None for jira-task-reviewer. These belong to the JST-122 feature (conversation-debugger) under review, not to the reviewer skill — run-specific, not worth promoting into the reviewer's shared scripts. If anything they argue for a test fixture living beside collect_feature.ps1/feature_report.ps1, which is a separate concern from this skill.

Verdict

Within its own scope the run is a clean, high-compliance single-step review: correct Windows dispatch, faithful step-1→6 walk, idempotency check, full-diff read, an APPROVE posted to both GitHub and Jira via --body-file, status left for the automation, and a correct S-APPROVED chat report — the agent even ran the code end-to-end to back its correctness call. The one thing to act on is operational, not a code change: after the review finished, the same session was redirected by the user into fixing and pushing five commits onto the very PR it had just approved, so the standing APPROVED verdict on PR #111 is now stale and the feature should get a fresh reviewer pass against its final diff. That is user override of a completed run, so the finding lands on the humans/workflow, not on jira-task-reviewer's prose — the skill text needs no fix here.